Are you looking for a top-quality running shoe from Brooks? Then both the Glycerin 17 and Ghost 11 should be at the top of your list.
But, which one is better? Keep on reading for our comparison of the Brooks Ghost vs Brooks Glycerin.
Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin
Brooks has held the top spot of the number one running shoe company in the United States for quite a while now. Believe it or not, Brooks wasn’t always into developing running shoes. In fact, it has more than 100-year history.
Brooks started out as a footwear company that focused mostly on cleated sports shoes and ice skates if you can believe it. But as time went by, Brooks caught up with a 70s trend known as the running boom and eventually became one of the United States top three running shoe companies.
Brooks is Known for Top-Quality Running Shoes
Sure there were a couple of bumps on the way, but through and through, Brooks has been one of the giants in the running shoe business since the mid-90s. Not only does the company produce high-quality running shoes, but it also makes them suitable for professional and rookie athletes of different abilities. This is exactly why Brooks Running is constantly recommended as a favorite for the running community.
Brooks and Ghost: Two of the Most Popular Runners
Arguably, two of Brooks’ top runners are the Glycerin and the Ghost. Whenever the best running shoes are concerned, these two will always be the most coveted products there are. Brooks always ups the ante with these two when it comes to technological updates. These two shoes are neutral-based running shoes that excel in speed, comfort, and performance.
Brooks Glycerin 17 vs Ghost 11: Which one is the Best?
While these two are great choices for runners, you can only choose one in the end. That’s why we prepared this article to give you the rundown on both shoe types and let you know which one deserves to help you go the distance while providing unparalleled comfort at the same time.
Where Can I Get More Information About Them?
We’ve done full reviews of both of these running shoes. You can see them here:
Ghost vs Glycerin Comparison
The 7 Factors We Compared for the Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin
To make a true comparison, we believe it’s only fair to use the latest iterations of Ghost and Glycerin, as in 11 and 17, respectively. We will look into the following aspects:
- Cushioning Technology
- Customer Reviews
Now let’s find out in the matchup of Ghost vs Glycerin, which running shoe will walk away with the gold.
#1: Cushioning Technology for the Brooks Glycerin vs Ghost
Cushioning is extremely important for a running shoe. You want something that is able to absorb the shock well from each foot strike in order to prevent injuries and fatigue.
Cushioning: Ghost 11
Brooks Ghost is a quintessential leader in the neutral running environment. It is consistently one of the highest rated running shoes to have ever received praise from top professional to novice runners alike.
By far, one of Brooks Ghost’s most talked about aspects is the signature comfort they provide with their products. The Ghost 11, in particular, uses the brand’s signature BioMoGo DNA foam in their midsole. This cushioning technology adapts to the runner’s weight, gait, and stride, offering a customized running experience.
Because of this, the cushioning for the shoe is powerfully comfortable and plush. The Ghost 11 has been praised especially by runners for being comfortable even during long distances and never once did they experience a jarring feeling during impact.
Sounds like the right shoe for you? You can easily find it online. Check now for the lowest prices and also to see if it’s eligible for free shipping with an Amazon Prime membership:
Cushioning: Glycerin 17
Like the Ghost, Glycerin also maintains the brand’s signature comforting characteristic. The only difference is that Glycerin 17 uses a cushioning technology that is known as Super DNA. It’s an adaptable foam-based system as well and is connected in a more sophisticated pattern that other foam carriers.
This makes the Glycerin 17 more plush than the Ghost 10 and has a better overall feel. Runners reported to find the cushioning on Glycerin smoother and that it offered more complete protection from impact. Also, like the Ghost, Glycerin proved highly capable of being able to withstand long distances as well.
If you think the Glycerin 17 might be the right running shoe for you, you can learn more about it by clicking the button below:
Brooks Glycerin 17 Review
#2: Upper for the Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin
The upper of the shoe is very important for a few different reasons. First of all, it should be made from lightweight, breathable materials. Secondly, it should lock your feet into place well so that they’re not sliding around during a run.
Upper: Ghost 11
The Ghost 11 consists of an engineered mesh upper, which is a staple for Brooks running shoes for a while now. This mesh is very airy and breathable. It gently wraps the runner’s foot without it coming off as suffocating and uncomfortable. Although some meshes tend to be too thin, allowing them to break easy, Ghost 11’s mesh is just as comfortable as it is durable.
The shoe’s Stretch Print technology provides wearers the security they need and usually praised how flexible the upper is and how it usually breaks-in more with sustained wear.
Upper: Glycerin 17
Unlike the Ghost 11, Glycerin 17 doesn’t feature an engineered mesh upper. What it uses instead is a single mesh across the entire shoe. This makes the entire upper part of a single material that is both flexible and comfortable.
Glycerin 17 uses the 3D stretch print material which allows Glycerin to opt for printed and elastic overlays instead of the traditional structural overlays. It lets the runners move more flexibly within the shoe without being hampered by rigid structural overlays at the midfoot.
Let’s get straight to the point. The vast majority of people factor in price when it comes to buying a pair of shoes, or almost anything for that matter. Let’s find out which one comes out ahead.
Pricing: Ghost 11
Even though it provided quality running shoes, Brooks never pressured customers on the pricing for its products. Even Ghost 11, which is priced reasonably at a bit over $100, is priced as such so it can compete with other brands like Nike, Adidas, and Saucony.
It may be that Brooks has priced Ghost 11 more than some of its more adequately priced shoes, we found this pricing to be reasonable due to the tech that is incorporated into this product.
Of course, prices change with time and there are periodically sales and deals to be found. You can see the current prices for the Brooks Ghost 11 below:
- The Brooks Ghost 11 running shoe features a lightweight construction and a smoother ride from heel...
- Predecessor: Ghost 10.
- Support Type: Neutral.
- Cushioning: High energizing cushioning.
- Surface: Road. Differential: 12mm. Heel/Toe: 30mm/18mm. Offers medium to high arch support....
Pricing: Glycerin 17
The Glycerin has a more premium cost than the Ghost. The shoe has been priced to compete with other technologically-advanced shoes such as Nike’s Lunarepic. From that aspect, it makes sense considering the amount of attention that Brooks invested to differentiate itself from the Ghost.
Glycerin presently retails at well over a hundred dollars. That said, prices fluctuate considerably and there are sometimes deals that may include free shipping. Check the chart below for the current price on the Brooks Glycerin Running Shoe:
- The Brooks Glycerin 17 running shoe will let you go the distance with its incredible flexibility,...
- Predecessor: Glycerin 16.
- Support Type: Neutral.
- Cushioning: Maximum cushioning.
- Surface: Road. Differential: 10 mm Please click here for more information about Glycerin 17...
If you run on a variety of surfaces besides dry pavement, this is going to be a major consideration for you.
Traction: Ghost 11
For traction, Ghost uses a dual rubber compound. A carbon rubber compound is used on the outsole’s heel and a normal blown rubber compound is used on the forefoot. This enables the Ghost 11 to be versatile in high-impact wear areas like the heel and the forefront.
Traction: Glycerin 17
Like the Ghost, Glycerin also uses a dual rubber compound for traction. However, Glycerin features the material in its midsole area along with more surface area contact that the Ghost.
Ghost 11 Review
#5: Features Brooks Ghost 11 vs Brooks Glycerin 17
Of course, you’ll want to consider the features of any sneaker before dropping some cash on it, right? Here’s the quick summary of what you can look forward to for each of these shoes.
Brooks Ghost Features
- 12 mm heel to toe drop
- Neutral support runner (the Brooks 10 was considered more of a stability shoe for overpronators)
- Very supportive cushioning that leads to softer foot strikes
- Medium to high arch support (Check out the Nike Lunar Glide if you want less arch support)
- Engineered mesh upper provides excellent breathability
- Plush tongue and collar that’s comfortable for long runs
- Removable foam insole (can be used with orthotics to improve your gait if necessary)
- Responsive sole with a nice level of flexibility
- Variety of size options
Brooks Glycerin Features
- Breathable mesh upper
- Responsive design
- Variety of colors and styles
- Neutral running shoe
- Maximum amount of cushioning
- 10 mm heel toe drop
- 3D printed overlay for a nice level of support
- Bootie style fit
- Removable insole makes them ideal for inserts
- DNA Loft transition zone
- Rubber outsole has excellent traction
- Light in weight
#6: Style for the Brooks Glycerin 17 vs Ghost 11
Which one you prefer is really a matter or personal preference. You can check them out below:
Brooks Ghost 11
Brooks Glycerin 17
#7: Customer Reviews
What do actual users have to say about these two popular Brooks shoes? Let’s find out here.
Brooks Ghost User Reviews
“I work in healthcare and have to spend up to 12 hours a day on my feet. I suffer from PF and have a really difficult time finding comfortable enough shoes that I’m not in excruciating pain at the end of the day. Thankfully I tried out these on the advice of my physiotherapist and am very happy that I did. They have a nice level of arch support, great cushioning and are some of the most comfortable shoes I’ve ever worn.”
“So much lighter and more comfortable than the shoes I was using before. I’ve been running almost daily, around 50 miles per week in them for the last six months and they’re only now showing some initial signs of wear and tear. I think I’ll get another six months out of them for sure. Quite impressive!”
“Over the years, I’ve been running with Nike, New Balance, and Adidas shoes, but have been having some injuries lately. I did a ton of research because I wanted to mix things up a little bit. I decided to go for the Brooks Ghost shoes and I’m so happy I did. The second I put them on, I just knew they were right for me. Kind of like pillows on my feet and they’ve helped keep my plantar fasciitis at bay.
Brooks Glycerin Customer Reviews
“An amazing running shoe that’s one of the best I’ve ever tried. I run 50+ miles a week so need something with nice cushioning and support and these ones are awesome. No feet or shin injuries and I’ve been using them for years now.”
“Brooks shoes have always worked well for my feet—high arches and plantar fasciitis. These ones are no exception. A nice level of arch support but not too much to be uncomfortable, along with lots of cushioning for my sore feet.”
“I have lots of lower back issues so have to be super careful with the shoes that I wear. I’ve given others a try, but always end up going back to these ones.”
Final Thoughts on the Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin Running Shoes
All in all, the Ghost and the Glycerin are equally amazing neutral running shoes in their own rights. But if we had to choose between them, it would be Ghost. Not only is it a more affordable option, but it’s also suitable for both advanced and rookie runners alike. But if quality, greater comfort, and durability are what you want, then Glycerin is the one for you.
Have your Say about the Brooks Glycerin 17 vs. Ghost 11
What’s your top pick for Brooks running shoe? Leave a comment below and let us know what you think.
Also be sure to give this article a share on Facebook, Twitter, or Pinterest. It’ll help other runners, like yourself find this useful resource.
Latest posts by John James (see all)
- Xero Shoes Review: The Best Minimalist Shoes for CrossFit? - June 19, 2019
- Asics Conviction X Review: The Best Asics CrossFit Shoe? - June 12, 2019
- Nike Romaleos 3 Weightlifting Shoe Review - May 14, 2019
Last update on 2019-06-24 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API